Quakeland: On the Road to America’s Next Devastating Earthquake: Revelation 6

Quakeland: On the Road to America’s Next Devastating Earthquake

Roger BilhamQuakeland: New York and the Sixth Seal (Revelation 6:12)

Given recent seismic activity — political as well as geological — it’s perhaps unsurprising that two books on earthquakes have arrived this season. One is as elegant as the score of a Beethoven symphony; the other resembles a diary of conversations overheard during a rock concert. Both are interesting, and both relate recent history to a shaky future.

Journalist Kathryn Miles’s Quakeland is a litany of bad things that happen when you provoke Earth to release its invisible but ubiquitous store of seismic-strain energy, either by removing fluids (oil, water, gas) or by adding them in copious quantities (when extracting shale gas in hydraulic fracturing, also known as fracking, or when injecting contaminated water or building reservoirs). To complete the picture, she describes at length the bad things that happen during unprovoked natural earthquakes. As its subtitle hints, the book takes the form of a road trip to visit seismic disasters both past and potential, and seismologists and earthquake engineers who have first-hand knowledge of them. Their colourful personalities, opinions and prejudices tell a story of scientific discovery and engineering remedy.

Miles poses some important societal questions. Aside from human intervention potentially triggering a really damaging earthquake, what is it actually like to live in neighbourhoods jolted daily by magnitude 1–3 earthquakes, or the occasional magnitude 5? Are these bumps in the night acceptable? And how can industries that perturb the highly stressed rocks beneath our feet deny obvious cause and effect? In 2015, the Oklahoma Geological Survey conceded that a quadrupling of the rate of magnitude-3 or more earthquakes in recent years, coinciding with a rise in fracking, was unlikely to represent a natural process. Miles does not take sides, but it’s difficult for the reader not to.

She visits New York City, marvelling at subway tunnels and unreinforced masonry almost certainly scheduled for destruction by the next moderate earthquake in the vicinity. She considers the perils of nuclear-waste storage in Nevada and Texas, and ponders the risks to Idaho miners of rock bursts — spontaneous fracture of the working face when the restraints of many million years of confinement are mined away. She contemplates the ups and downs of the Yellowstone Caldera — North America’s very own mid-continent supervolcano — and its magnificently uncertain future. Miles also touches on geothermal power plants in southern California’s Salton Sea and elsewhere; the vast US network of crumbling bridges, dams and oil-storage farms; and the magnitude 7–9 earthquakes that could hit California and the Cascadia coastline of Oregon and Washington state this century. Amid all this doom, a new elementary school on the coast near Westport, Washington, vulnerable to inbound tsunamis, is offered as a note of optimism. With foresight and much persuasion from its head teacher, it was engineered to become an elevated safe haven.

Miles briefly discusses earthquake prediction and the perils of getting it wrong (embarrassment in New Madrid, Missouri, where a quake was predicted but never materialized; prison in L’Aquila, Italy, where scientists failed to foresee a devastating seismic event) and the successes of early-warning systems, with which electronic alerts can be issued ahead of damaging seismic waves. Yes, it’s a lot to digest, but most of the book obeys the laws of physics, and it is a engaging read. One just can’t help wishing that Miles’s road trips had taken her somewhere that wasn’t a disaster waiting to happen.

Catastrophic damage in Anchorage, Alaska, in 1964, caused by the second-largest earthquake in the global instrumental record.

In The Great Quake, journalist Henry Fountain provides us with a forthright and timely reminder of the startling historical consequences of North America’s largest known earthquake, which more than half a century ago devastated southern Alaska. With its epicentre in Prince William Sound, the 1964 quake reached magnitude 9.2, the second largest in the global instrumental record. It released more energy than either the 2004 Sumatra–Andaman earthquake or the 2011 Tohoku earthquake off Japan; and it generated almost as many pages of scientific commentary and description as aftershocks. Yet it has been forgotten by many.

The quake was scientifically important because it occurred at a time when plate tectonics was in transition from hypothesis to theory. Fountain expertly traces the theory’s historical development, and how the Alaska earthquake was pivotal in nailing down one of the most important predictions. The earthquake caused a fjordland region larger than England to subside, and a similarly huge region of islands offshore to rise by many metres; but its scientific implications were not obvious at the time. Eminent seismologists thought that a vertical fault had slipped, drowning forests and coastlines to its north and raising beaches and islands to its south. But this kind of fault should have reached the surface, and extended deep into Earth’s mantle. There was no geological evidence of a monster surface fault separating these two regions, nor any evidence for excessively deep aftershocks. The landslides and liquefied soils that collapsed houses, and the tsunami that severely damaged ports and infrastructure, offered no clues to the cause.

“Previous earthquakes provide clear guidance about present-day vulnerability.” The hero of The Great Quake is the geologist George Plafker, who painstakingly mapped the height reached by barnacles lifted out of the intertidal zone along shorelines raised by the earthquake, and documented the depths of drowned forests. He deduced that the region of subsidence was the surface manifestation of previously compressed rocks springing apart, driving parts of Alaska up and southwards over the Pacific Plate. His finding confirmed a prediction of plate tectonics, that the leading edge of the Pacific Plate plunged beneath the southern edge of Alaska along a gently dipping thrust fault. That observation, once fully appreciated, was applauded by the geophysics community.

Fountain tells this story through the testimony of survivors, engineers and scientists, interweaving it with the fascinating history of Alaska, from early discovery by Europeans to purchase from Russia by the United States in 1867, and its recent development. Were the quake to occur now, it is not difficult to envisage that with increased infrastructure and larger populations, the death toll and price tag would be two orders of magnitude larger than the 139 fatalities and US$300-million economic cost recorded in 1964.

What is clear from these two books is that seismicity on the North American continent is guaranteed to deliver surprises, along with unprecedented economic and human losses. Previous earthquakes provide clear guidance about the present-day vulnerability of US infrastructure and populations. Engineers and seismologists know how to mitigate the effects of future earthquakes (and, in mid-continent, would advise against the reckless injection of waste fluids known to trigger earthquakes). It is merely a matter of persuading city planners and politicians that if they are tempted to ignore the certainty of the continent’s seismic past, they should err on the side of caution when considering its seismic future.

The Nuclear fears at Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Plant: Jeremiah 12

zaporizhzhia_nuclear_powerplant.jpg

Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant. CC BY-SA 3.0 – Photo: 2024

Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant: The “Sum of All Fears”

By Leonam dos Santos Guimarães*

RIO DE JANEIRO | 12 April 2024 (IDN) — Drone attacks on the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, whether carried out by Ukraine or Russia, introduce a new and dangerous dimension to the conflict between the two largest former Soviet Socialist Republics, with possible far-reaching ramifications, not just for the region immediately surrounding the largest nuclear power plant in Europe, but also for all European Union countries and, more broadly, for the international community.

The biggest concern is the potential risk of a severe nuclear accident, which could have dire effects not only on Ukraine and Russia, but also on neighboring countries. The release of radioactive material knows no borders, and a contaminated cloud could spread across multiple nations depending on weather conditions, putting public health and the environment at risk on a significant scale.

The consequences of attacks on nuclear facilities are potentially severe and vast. A nuclear accident can result in the contamination of large areas, affecting land, water and wildlife, with lasting consequences for the environment and human health. It could also force mass evacuations of affected areas, creating humanitarian and refugee crises. In addition to the direct costs of cleanup and containment, a nuclear disaster can have a substantial economic impact on agriculture, land use, and public health.

Containing a leak at a nuclear power plant is a highly complex and challenging operation, depending on several factors. These include the type of damage to the reactor or other critical parts of the facility, as well as the amount and type of radioactive material released.

A plant’s ability to contain a leak depends on its design, existing safety systems, and how well those systems can handle the specific type of accident. The effectiveness of the immediate response, including confining the area, evacuating personnel, and implementing decontamination measures, is crucial to minimizing the impacts of a spill. The availability of technical, human, and financial resources to manage the situation is essential. This also includes international support, as seen after the Chernobyl accident and the Fukushima disaster.

Several factors

The scope of a nuclear accident in Europe will depend on several factors, including the direction and speed of the wind, which determine the dispersion of radioactive particles in the atmosphere, the amount of material released, which the greater the amount, the larger the area potentially affected, and the effectiveness of containment and decontamination measures, which can significantly limit the scope of contamination.

In any case, it is important to highlight that the severity of a severe accident at the Zaporizhzhia Power Plant would most likely have significantly smaller consequences than the Chernobyl accident due to the technical characteristics of the different types of reactors involved: Pressurized Water Reactors PWR, moderated and air-cooled liquid light water in Zaporizhzhia and Reaktor Bolshoy Moshchnosty Kanalnyy RBMK, moderated to graphite and cooled to boiling light water in Chernobyl.

The great severity of the Chernobyl accident was caused, fundamentally, by the fire of hundreds of tons of graphite. The energy released by this immense “bonfire” in turn launched hundreds of tons of radioactive material at high altitudes, which were dispersed by the effect of the direction and intensity of the winds at great distances from the plant.

In a PWR reactor, no equivalent amounts of energy can be released under accidental conditions, which limits the quantity, height, and range of nuclear materials released into the atmosphere even in the most severe accidental conditions.

It is important to note that Europe has an early warning system for nuclear emergencies, ECURIE. This system ensures that member countries are quickly informed about nuclear accidents that may affect them, allowing for a coordinated and effective response.

The possibility that such attacks could trigger a third world war is a serious and plausible concern. An intricate web of military alliances, geopolitical interests and containment strategies influences the dynamics of the current conflict. Attacks against nuclear facilities are perceived as significant escalations of conflict. If considered acts of war, they may justify severe retaliation. The nature and extent of such retaliations would depend on many factors, including the international perception of the incident and the strategic decisions of major world powers.

The risk of a third world war

The involvement of NATO members providing support to Ukraine further complicates the situation. While NATO has been careful in its approach to avoid direct escalation with Russia, the line between support and direct involvement is fine and delicate. Preventing an escalation into a broader conflict will likely depend on intense diplomatic efforts and attempts at de-escalation by all parties involved.

While the risk of a third world war arising from such attacks cannot be completely ruled out, many countries and international organizations are deeply committed to avoiding such a scenario. The situation requires constant vigilance, careful diplomacy and, possibly, a reassessment of security protocols around nuclear facilities in conflict zones.

In the past, the safety of nuclear power plants amid war was a purely theoretical part of their safety analysis reports. Generally, it was considered in terms of a single occurrence, such as a plane crashing into the dome of a containment structure or damaging one of the important elements of a power plant’s operation following a terrorist attack. During the design and construction of most currently operating reactors, a terrorist attack seemed very unlikely. It was enough to take into account the complete failure of any elements, regardless of the cause. The project ensured the safety of a station after such initial events.

In 2011, the earthquake and tsunami in Japan, assessed as having negligible probability, certainly changed perceptions of safety. The probability of being affected by war changed in a similar way. The assumption that a country with nuclear energy is developed enough not to be drawn into a military conflict on its territory influences the assessment that such a possibility is low. However, events can contradict our optimistic predictions with surprising frequency. In Ukraine, recent events have increased the likelihood of such events occurring.

The relationship between nuclear energy and war began in the 1950s. Since then, conflicts have occurred in at least eight countries with nuclear plants or programs, such as Yugoslavia, Iran, Iraq, Syria, India, Pakistan, Armenia, and, finally, Ukraine. We will examine these in a future article.

*The writer is a nuclear and naval engineer (PhD) member of the Brazilian National Academy of Engineering. CEO of Eletronuclear S.A. Coordinator, Brazilian Navy Nuclear Propulsion Program. [IDN-InDepthNews]

Photo: Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant. CC BY-SA 3.0

The Iranian Horn Prepares to Attack Israel: Revelation 11

US Warns Americans in Israel Amid Fears of Iran Attack
In this photo released by the official website of the office of the Iranian supreme leader, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei leads Eid al-Fitr prayer marking the end of the Muslims holy fasting month of Ramadan, in Tehran, Iran, Wednesday, April 10, 2024.   (Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader via AP)

Iranian Attack on Israel Seen as Imminent

US restricts the travel of Americans in the country

Iran may launch a serious strike against Israel in retaliation for the April 1 strike on the Iranian embassy in Syria as soon as Friday, US officials tell CBS News. As Israel braces for the assault, the US imposed travel restrictions on Americans in the country, per the Washington Post. Little is known of Tehran’s plans, but experts fear a direct attack, especially one with significant casualties, could trigger wider war in the Middle East. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Thursday Israel was “prepared … both defensively and offensively” and would harm “whoever harms us.”

But US officials tell CBS it would be hard for Israel to defend against a large-scale attack, potentially to include dozens of missiles and more than 100 drones. The US Embassy in Jerusalem issued a security warning to government employees and their families Thursday, saying to expect travel restrictions indefinitely. Americans are not to travel outside major cities, which are better protected by Israel’s missile defense system. A US senior general is in Israel to help coordinate any response if appropriate, per CBS. One security expert tells the outlet a military asset might be targeted and the chance of an all-out war is real.

The US Embassy alert didn’t name Iran and said travel restrictions came “out of an abundance of caution.” Israel has not publicly claimed responsibility for the April 1 strike on the Iranian embassy in the Syrian capital of Damascus, said to have killed two senior members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and five other officers. Nonetheless, Iran vowed the country would be punished. US officials had no prior warning of the strike on the diplomatic compound, a location “traditionally exempted from hostilities,” per the Washington Post. (More Israel stories.)

Israel Prepares For Iran’s Trampling of the Outer Court: Revelation 11

Israel Strikes Gaza As Massive Iran Attack Threat Puts Region On Edge

Israel Strikes Gaza As Massive Iran Attack Threat Puts Region On Edge

As ceasefire talks aiming to pause the six-month-old war dragged on, fears that Iran could soon launch an attack on Israel spurred France to recommend its citizens avoid travelling to the region.

World NewsAgence France-PresseUpdated: April 12, 2024 7:34 pm IST

Israel last week pulled its troops from Khan Yunis city after months of fighting (File)

Residents reported heavy Israeli fire in central Gaza on Friday, with regional tensions soaring after Iran threatened reprisals over a strike in Syria this month that killed two Iranian generals.

As ceasefire talks aiming to pause the six-month-old war dragged on, fears that Iran could soon launch an attack on Israel spurred France to recommend its citizens avoid travelling to the region.

Mohammed al-Rayes, 61, told AFP that he fled Israeli “air strikes and artillery shelling” in Nuseirat, central Gaza overnight.

Another resident, Laila Nasser, 40, reported “shells and missiles” throughout the night.

“They will do to Nuseirat what they did to Khan Yunis,” said Nasser, vowing to flee to the southernmost city of Rafah, like most of Gaza’s population.

Israel last week pulled its troops from the devastated city of Khan Yunis after months of fighting, but officials said they were preparing for operations against Hamas operatives in Rafah, near the Egyptian border.

Authorities in the Hamas-ruled coastal Palestinian territory on Friday reported dozens of new air strikes in Gaza’s central region.

The Hamas media office said 25 people were taken to hospital in Deir al-Balah city “as a result of an air strike on a house of the al-Tabatibi family.”

Syria strikes

Israel’s military said its aircraft had struck more than 60 Hamas operatives in Gaza over the previous day.

The war began with Hamas’s unprecedented October 7 attack against Israel which resulted in the deaths of 1,170 people, mostly civilians, according to Israeli figures.

Israel’s retaliatory offensive has killed at least 33,634 people in Gaza, mostly women and children, according to the territory’s health ministry. The ministry’s updated toll on Friday included at least 89 deaths over the previous day.

The latest bombardments in Gaza came after Israel said it was strengthening air defences and paused leave for combat units, following a deadly April 1 air strike that destroyed Iran’s consulate building in Damascus.

Iran blamed Israel, its arch foe, which has stepped up strikes against Iran-linked targets in Syria since the Gaza war began.

Among the targets have been fighters from Lebanon’s Hezbollah movement in Syria. The group has also exchanged regular deadly fire with Israel over the Lebanese border since October.

Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian said late Thursday he had received phone calls from German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock as well as her British and Australian counterparts.

‘Significant attack’

In a post on X, the Iranian minister said he had told them that “when the Zionist regime breaches the immunity of diplomatic persons and places” and the UN Security Council fails to condemn it, “legitimate defence… is a necessity”.

He added that “Iran does not seek to expand the scope of the war.”

United States President Joe Biden had on Wednesday said Iran is “threatening to launch a significant attack on Israel,” and pledged “ironclad” support for Washington’s top regional ally despite diplomatic tensions over Israel’s military conduct in Gaza.

US Central Command chief, General Michael Kurilla, was in Israel on Thursday to discuss the situation with Defence Minister Yoav Gallant, the Pentagon said.

France on Friday warned its nationals against travelling to Iran, Israel, Lebanon or the Palestinian territories, after the US embassy in Israel announced it was restricting the movements of its diplomats over security fears.

Moscow and Berlin urged restraint.

German airline Lufthansa extended a temporary suspension of flights to and from Tehran until Saturday.

In their October attack, Hamas operatives seized about 250 hostages, 129 of whom remain in Gaza, including 34 the Israeli army says are dead.

Netanyahu leads a coalition including religious and ultra-nationalist parties, and is under pressure from anti-government protesters and relatives of the hostages demanding the government get them home.

Tens of thousands have taken to the streets.

On Thursday night, hundreds demonstrated near Netanyahu’s Jerusalem residence with a different call — for the war to continue.

Father’s appeal

“You, members of the cabinet, must state clearly that the fighting will not stop, that the IDF and our good sons will continue to crush the enemy until a complete victory,” said Itzik Buntzel, the father of Israeli soldier Amit Buntzel who was killed in Gaza.

Washington has ramped up pressure on Netanyahu to agree to a truce, increase aid flows and abandon plans to send troops into Rafah.

Israeli Defence Minister Gallant said on Wednesday that Israel would “flood Gaza with aid”, using an Israeli crossing point, streamlined checks, the Ashdod port and two new routes organised with Jordan.

However, on Thursday the United Nations Security Council said “more should be done to bring the required relief given the scale of needs in Gaza”.

The UN says famine is imminent in Gaza, much of which has been reduced to a bombed-out wasteland.

World Health Organization chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said an assessment team that visited Khan Yunis found “destruction disproportionate to anything one can imagine” and three medical centres that were no longer functioning.

Truce talks which started on Sunday in Cairo have brought no breakthrough on a plan presented by US, Qatari and Egyptian mediators, which Hamas said it was studying.

The framework plan would halt fighting for six weeks and see the exchange of about 40 hostages for hundreds of Palestinian prisoners, as well as more aid deliveries.

Israel on Thursday accused Hamas of “walking away” from what government spokesman David Mencer called “a very reasonable offer on the table”.

Bassem Naim, of the Hamas political bureau, said a ceasefire is needed to locate Israeli hostages held by various groups across the territory and ascertain their fate.

Can We Prepare for the Sixth Seal? Revelation 6

A magnitude 4.8 earthquake shook the East Coast shortly after 10:20 a.m. Friday morning, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. (USGS Photo)

Uncommon 4.8 Magnitude Earthquake Provides Valuable Lessons in Disaster Preparedness

Though East Coast states have different seismic standards than West Coast ones, experts say the lack of significant damage from Friday’s quake bodes well.

ByHomeland Security Today

April 12, 2024

Within minutes of a Friday morning earthquake that struck the Northeast, New York City’s emergency management officials set out to check for damage, said Jackie Bray, commissioner of the New York State Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Services.

Under the state’s emergency operations plan, city and state structural engineers were immediately deployed to inspect bridges, tunnels and other key infrastructure, and nuclear plants were required to report any damage within 15 minutes, she said. They found nothing significant, Bray said.

But experts say it’s still worth considering what could have gone wrong. “These are important teachable moments for what-ifs, and what would we do if it was worse,” said Jeffrey Schlegelmilch, director of the National Center for Disaster Preparedness at Columbia University.

Read the rest of the story at NBC Newshere.

Iraqi Horn Wants to Nuke Up: Daniel 8

Iraq revives nuclear ambitions 43 years after Israeli Bombing, garners international attention

Iraq revives nuclear ambitions 43 years after Israeli Bombing, garners international attention

ReportIraqBreakingIsrael

2024-04-11 12:02ShareFont

Shafaq News/ Iraq is revisiting its pursuit of nuclear energy, marking 43 years since the Israeli Bombing of the “Tammuz” reactor situated in the Tuwaitha area, southeast of Baghdad. Iraqi officials affirm that the renewed focus on nuclear energy will be strictly for peaceful purposes and intended for various developmental sectors, notably the electrical energy domain.

Since the 1960s, Iraq has endeavored to officially join the “Peace Nuclear Club,” leveraging its scientific capabilities and resources to pursue this objective. In early 1975, France agreed to construct two nuclear reactors in Tuwaitha area/ Iraq, resembling those at the Nuclear Research Center affiliated with the French Energy Agency (CEA). The first reactor, named Tammuz 1, boasted a capacity of 40 MW, while the second, Tammuz 2, was constructed for training purposes, with a capacity of 600 kilowatts.

As the Iraqi reactor neared completion, history was made with a groundbreaking military operation on June 7, 1981, as the Israeli Air Force executed a precise strike, resulting in the complete destruction of the Iraqi nuclear reactor.

In addition to the Israeli strike, American aircraft targeted and destroyed two Iraqi nuclear sites during the 1991 Gulf War.

Iraq has initiated steps to reintegrate into “peaceful” nuclear activity.

On January 31, 2017, Law No. (43) of 2016 regarding the Iraqi Atomic Energy Commission was officially published in the Iraqi newspaper Al-Waqayie Al-eiraqia, under issue (4431). This publication followed the approval of the law by the Iraqi House of Representatives and its subsequent ratification by the Presidency of the Republic.

In this context, Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani declared on March 18, 2024, Iraq’s intention to pursue nuclear activities for peaceful purposes.

According to specialists, Iraq has submitted its plan to the International Atomic Energy Agency for the period from 2023 to 2030. This plan entails the construction of nuclear reactors, subcritical systems, and nuclear power stations, collectively known as the nuclear fuel cycle. The absence of nuclear reactors is estimated to cost Iraq 3 to 5 billion dollars annually. The construction cost of these reactors varies between $100 million and $200 million, depending on their specifications and intended use, with a construction timeline of 5 to 6 years for each new reactor.

“IAEA’s Columns: New Chapters”

Iraq’s efforts to revitalize its nuclear program appear to be occurring under the scrutiny of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Collaborating with Iraq, the IAEA is overseeing the decommissioning of outdated facilities and the construction of a peaceful nuclear reactor.

During his visit to Iraq on April 2, the Director of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Rafael Grossi, highlighted the transformation of the Tuwaitha nuclear reactor. Once a source of global concern, Grossi emphasized that it now represents a hopeful trajectory toward successful remediation. He underscored that nearly 43 years have passed since the destruction of Iraq’s first nuclear reactor by Israel. Grossi affirmed that Iraq is entering a new phase in its nuclear energy endeavors, which are focused on peaceful purposes and supported by the International Atomic Energy Agency. He emphasized the collaborative effort to develop a roadmap for Iraq’s nuclear activities, infrastructure construction, and acquisition of nuclear technology for peaceful applications.

The recent initiatives undertaken by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) were preceded by the Director of the Agency extending an official invitation to Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani in March 2024 to attend the Nuclear Energy Summit scheduled in Brussels during the same month. Additionally, the Director confirmed that the Agency anticipates a visit from an Iraqi delegation to its headquarters in the forthcoming weeks. This visit aims to facilitate the development of a roadmap that will enable Iraq to acquire nuclear technology for peaceful purposes.

“Assessment of Needs and Provision of Additional Support”

During his visit to Al-Amal Cancer National Hospital, Grossi remarked on the significant progress observed in disease treatments.

The Agency also announced its efforts to address gaps in Iraq’s healthcare infrastructure, with two governorates lacking radiotherapy centers set to receive essential care. Additional support will encompass training, capacity building, and the provision of equipment and funding. These initiatives are crucial steps towards bridging the gap in cancer care, offering hope, and delivering life-saving treatments to a larger number of Iraqis.

“Radiation Protection Center”

The Radiation Protection Center conducts daily and continuous monitoring of radiation levels in the Iraqi environment, along with radiation surveys in various areas of the country. Additionally, the Center operates a network of 21 early warning systems and radiation environmental monitoring stations, all linked to a central station at its headquarters. Notably, the Center has achieved success by integrating the national early warning system with the international radiation monitoring information system and the unified information exchange and reporting system for accidents and emergencies.

Iraq, represented by the Center, stands as the third Arab country in this field, following Jordan and Saudi Arabia. This collaboration enables the sharing of radiation background data with countries worldwide daily and continuously.

The Center also performs radiological examinations on imported foodstuffs arriving via border crossings to prevent radioactively contaminated materials entering Iraq. The Center is actively enhancing its radiological examination capacity at all border crossings through an integrated investment project.

This project entails the installation of radiation screening gates at all ports and the construction of four laboratories. Furthermore, the project involves the reference and integration of the gate network into a centrally controlled monitoring system operated by the Center.

Dr. Sabah Al-Husseini, Director General of the Radiation Protection Center, emphasized in an interview with Shafaq News Agency, “The utilization of nuclear energy for electricity generation carries considerable benefits, including the reduction of carbon emissions, diversification of energy sources, enhanced security, and the provision of environmentally sustainable and economically viable energy solutions for Iraq’s growing population.” He highlighted the Center’s crucial role in overseeing the decommissioning of nuclear facilities, management of radioactive waste, as well as activities related to nuclear medicine and radiotherapy.

Al-Husseini pointed out that these activities are rigorously monitored in accordance with quality management system instructions and controls approved by the International Atomic Energy Agency.

He further stated, “Nuclear energy stands as the optimal choice for the government due to its safety and environmentally friendly nature. It offers substantial quantities of electrical energy with minimal harmful carbon emissions, ensuring a consistent and reliable electricity supply year-round.”

Al-Husseini suggested, “the construction of research nuclear reactors yields positive outcomes” by:

1. Supplying radioisotopes for therapeutic medical applications and nuclear medicine.

2. Producing radioactive isotopes for industrial utilization.

3. Supporting research and agricultural endeavors, including pest control and resource enhancement.

The construction of nuclear power plants also yields significant positive outcomes by supplying environmentally friendly electricity and curbing carbon emissions. Additionally, it opens avenues for potential utilization in water desalination, further enhancing its beneficial impact on various sectors.

“International Supports and Iraqi Losses”

Al-Husseini further underscored, “Iraq benefits from substantial international support in reinstating its position in the domain of peaceful nuclear energy applications.” He noted that this backing materialized during the visit of the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency, who held discussions with the Prime Minister and other senior officials.

The Director General reiterated the Agency’s commitment to providing the necessary assistance for Iraq to acquire nuclear technology and establish reactors for research and electricity production purposes.

Regarding Iraq’s losses, he said, “The annual losses incurred by Iraq are immeasurable, with one of the most significant being the country’s reliance on importing radioactive isotopes crucial for cancer treatment in the medical sector. Constructing a national research reactor could eliminate this need for imports, directly benefiting citizens by reducing the burden on patients and their families. Providing these isotopes domestically plays a crucial role in alleviating the challenges faced by treated patients and their loved ones.”

“Higher Education in Focus”

On October 11, 2023, Minister of Higher Education and Scientific Research, Naeem Al-Aboudi, declared the preliminary approval for constructing a zero-power nuclear reactor exclusively designated for scientific research and educational purposes, benefiting university students. He emphasized that the reactor would offer invaluable support to students and researchers across universities.

The selected site for the reactor’s construction will undergo decontamination from radioactive pollutants, with regulatory constraints lifted, thereby fostering advancements in the country’s scientific research sector.

Al-Aboudi, who also serves as the head of the Atomic Energy Commission, affirmed on March 26, 2023, during a visit to the Russian city of Sochi, that Iraq possesses a defined strategy in the realm of nuclear reactors.

Meanwhile, during a separate meeting with the Director of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Al-Aboudi reiterated, “Iraq was once a pioneer in its pursuit of nuclear energy and now aims to be among the nations utilizing nuclear energy for peaceful purposes.”

He emphasized that “despite the destruction of all nuclear facilities under the former Baath regime’s misguided policies, Iraq’s capabilities and scientific expertise are poised to reclaim their rightful place.”

Al-Aboudi stressed the importance of harnessing nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, particularly in healthcare and agriculture, for the betterment of the populace.

Gaza Enters 42 month war: Revelation 11

With little fanfare, Gaza war enters a new stage, from high to low intensity

APRIL 11, 202412:25 PM E

Palestinians visit the graves of relatives killed in the war between Israel and Hamas. The cemetery is in the central Gaza town of Deir al-Balah. Wednesday marked the first day of the Muslim holiday of Eid al-Fitr, but it was a somber day throughout Gaza.

Abdel Kareem Hana/AP

Fighting in Gaza is down sharply. Aid deliveries are rising rapidly. Israel has withdrawn most of its troops from the ravaged territory.

After six months of the deadliest fighting ever between Israelis and Palestinians, the Gaza war has entered a new stage. The Israel-Hamas war is by no means over, and could drag on indefinitely. Yet months of high-intensity battles have given way to a more limited conflict, according to analysts closely tracking the war.

“We’ve entered into a very low-intensity phase,” said Hussein Ibish with the Arab Gulf States Institute in Washington.

The Israeli military now controls most of Gaza, therefore, he said, “there’s not that much more for the full might of the Israeli military to do. As for Hamas, they still can function as a fighting force. But it’s a much weaker fighting force than it used to be.”

“Both sides need to regroup, consider their positions and try to figure out what to do next,” Ibish added.

Neither side has formally acknowledged this change in the tempo of the war. Both Israel and Hamas maintain they’re still pursuing the same objectives as when the fighting began.

Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said again this week that his aim is to destroy Hamas. He added that there’s now a date for an Israeli offensive in Rafah, the city at the southern end of Gaza. Rafah is the last Hamas stronghold in the territory, and the place where more than 1 million Palestinians have taken refuge, many in tents.

“This victory requires entering Rafah and eliminating the terrorist battalions there,” Netanyahu said. “This will happen. There is a date.”

Egyptian Red Crescent trucks loaded with aid queue outside the Rafah border crossing with the Gaza Strip on March 23. After months of very limited aid deliveries to Gaza, the pace is picking up this week. More than 400 trucks are entering Gaza daily, according to Israel. This is more than double the previous rate.

Yet the Israeli leader did not provide a date and his statement goes against what’s happening on the ground in Gaza.

Israel’s military announced Sunday it had withdrawn a division from the southern city of Khan Younis, the main battleground over the past couple months, which is just a few miles from Rafah.

This was the latest in a series of troop drawdowns. Israel isn’t providing figures, but military analysts say the Israel Defense Forces, or IDF, have pulled out 90 percent or more of the troops that were in the territory a few months ago.

They say Israel has just one brigade left in Gaza, consisting of a couple thousand troops at most, compared to tens of thousands of forces in the territory at the peak.

As a result, they add, the Israeli military is in no position to launch a major ground operation in Rafah or anywhere else in Gaza at the moment.

Chuck Freilich, a former deputy national security advisor in Israel, believes an Israeli invasion of Rafah could still happen. But it would take weeks of preparations and such a buildup couldn’t be disguised.

“Israel would have to conduct a significant call up of the reserves to do so, and that would probably take a couple of weeks,” he said. In addition, “it would take certainly a number of weeks to move the Palestinian civilians in Rafah out of that area.”

THE PICTURE SHOW

Photos: Israel and Gaza, 6 months into the war

Airstrikes, small-scale fighting still ongoing

The Israeli troops still in Gaza are just inside the eastern edge of the territory, hugging the border with Israel. Others are positioned along a belt that runs across the middle of Gaza. They are dividing the territory into north and south to control the movement of Palestinians.

The vast majority of Palestinians have sought refuge in the southern part of Gaza, and Israel doesn’t want to see a large return of civilians — or Hamas militants — to the north.

Israel’s scaled-back presence is primarily designed to maintain control, though Israeli troops could also conduct small-scale operations.

Air strikes are still taking place daily, and Israel carried out one high-profile operation Wednesday, hitting a car near Gaza City.

The attack killed three adult sons and four grandsons of a top Hamas leader, Ismail Haniyeh, who lives in exile in Qatar. Israel claimed the three sons were involved in Hamas military operations.

Haniyeh acknowledged the deaths in a statement and said it would not change the Hamas positions in the indirect ceasefire talks with Israel.

“Whoever thinks that by targeting my kids during the negotiation talks, and before a deal is agreed upon, that it will force Hamas to back down on its demands, is delusional,” Haniyeh said.

The Palestinian death toll has now topped 33,000, according to Gaza health officials. They say more than 20,000 of the dead were women and children, while the Israeli military says about 13,000 Hamas fighters have been killed. Israel has lost nearly 1,500 civilians and soldiers from the Hamas attack in southern Israel on Oct. 7 and the subsequent fighting in Gaza.

MIDDLE EAST CRISIS — EXPLAINED

This isn’t the first time the U.S. and Israel have disagreed over Gaza

Meanwhile, cease-fire negotiations have been ongoing for weeks, though there’s no sign a breakthrough is imminent.

The basic outline is well-known: a six-week ceasefire that would be accompanied by the release of 40 Israeli hostages held by Hamas and hundreds of Palestinian prisoners jailed by Israel.

But the two sides are bogged down over the details. Freilich, the former Israeli security official, said both sides may be reluctant to sign on to a truce right now.

“I think Hamas has an interest to perpetuate this for as long as they can. Things are going quite well from their perspective,” said Freilich.

In his view, Hamas wanted to draw the Israeli military into Gaza and now seeks to keep the force bogged down in the territory. The ongoing war creates internal divisions in Israel as the country debates what to do next, and puts international pressure on Israel, while placing the spotlight on the Palestinian cause.

On the Israeli side, “Netanyahu may have a political interest in keeping things going for a while because it prevents early elections from being held,” Freilich said.

In Israel, there’s an almost universal expectation that elections will be held when the war is over, or perhaps even before it ends. Opinion polls show Netanyahu and right-wing Likud party are unpopular, and therefore would likely be tossed from power if an election is held in the near future.

More aid to Gaza

Meanwhile, aid deliveries to Gaza are up dramatically in recent days.

This follows last week’s Israeli air strike that killed seven aid workers from World Central Kitchen, an attack that prompted international outrage. This included a tense phone call between President Biden and Netanyahu. The president told the Israeli leader that the military must stop killing civilians and aid workers and ease the humanitarian crisis.

Over the past three days, more than 400 aid trucks have been entering Gaza daily, according to the Israelis. Over the past six months, the daily figure was often around 100 to 200 a day, with aid groups citing Israeli restrictions as the main problem.

The United Nations and aid organizations say Gaza needs, at minimum, about 500 truckloads of assistance per day. Israel says it’s now working to reach that level.

“Our policy has evolved to facilitate more and more aid,” Israel’s Defense Minister Yoav Gallant said Wednesday. “We plan to flood Gaza with aid and we are expecting to reach 500 trucks per day.”

Once the aid reaches Gaza, distributing it to all those in need has been a major challenge. The problem is particularly acute in northern Gaza, where hundreds of thousands of Palestinians remain, but aid groups say it has been difficult and dangerous to operate.

While the level of fighting is down, analysts say a limited conflict could play out for an extended period, and conditions could easily take a turn for the worse.

A formal truce is needed to stabilize Gaza, and even that is no solution if it doesn’t address the demands by both sides, which are in many ways contradictory.

Israel wants the return of all the Israeli hostages, it demands an end to Hamas rule of Gaza, and seeks security arrangements that ensure it will never suffer another attack like the one Hamas carried out on Oct. 7.

Sponsor Message

Hamas, in turn, wants to regain control over all of Gaza, it calls for Israeli troops to withdraw completely, and the group is seeking the release of all Palestinian prisoners. More broadly, Palestinians as a whole are seeking a political horizon leading to statehood.

Without progress on these issues, the analysts say, an end to the current war will leave in place conditions that could lead to the next conflict a few years down the road.

Greg Myre is an NPR national security correspondent who was based in Jerusalem from 2000-2007. Follow him @gregmyre1.