East Coast Still Unprepared For The Sixth Seal (Revelation 6:12)

East Coast Earthquake Preparedness
By By BEN NUCKOLS
Posted: 08/25/2011 8:43 am EDT
WASHINGTON — There were cracks in the Washington Monument and broken capstones at the National Cathedral. In the District of Columbia suburbs, some people stayed in shelters because of structural concerns at their apartment buildings.
A day after the East Coast’s strongest earthquake in 67 years, inspectors assessed the damage and found that most problems were minor. But the shaking raised questions about whether this part of the country, with its older architecture and inexperience with seismic activity, is prepared for a truly powerful quake.
The 5.8 magnitude quake felt from Georgia north to Canada prompted swift inspections of many structures Wednesday, including bridges and nuclear plants. An accurate damage estimate could take weeks, if not longer. And many people will not be covered by insurance.
In a small Virginia city near the epicenter, the entire downtown business district was closed. School was canceled for two weeks to give engineers time to check out cracks in several buildings.
At the 555-foot Washington Monument, inspectors found several cracks in the pyramidion – the section at the top of the obelisk where it begins narrowing to a point.
A 4-foot crack was discovered Tuesday during a visual inspection by helicopter. It cannot be seen from the ground. Late Wednesday, the National Park Service announced that structural engineers had found several additional cracks inside the top of the monument.
Carol Johnson, a park service spokeswoman, could not say how many cracks were found but said three or four of them were “significant.” Two structural engineering firms that specialize in assessing earthquake damage were being brought in to conduct a more thorough inspection on Thursday.
The monument, by far the tallest structure in the nation’s capital, was to remain closed indefinitely, and Johnson said the additional cracks mean repairs are likely to take longer. It has never been damaged by a natural disaster, including earthquakes in Virginia in 1897 and New York in 1944.
Tourists arrived at the monument Wednesday morning only to find out they couldn’t get near it. A temporary fence was erected in a wide circle about 120 feet from the flags that surround its base. Walkways were blocked by metal barriers manned by security guards.
“Is it really closed?” a man asked the clerk at the site’s bookstore.
“It’s really closed,” said the clerk, Erin Nolan. Advance tickets were available for purchase, but she cautioned against buying them because it’s not clear when the monument will open.
“This is pretty much all I’m going to be doing today,” Nolan said.
Tuesday’s quake was centered about 40 miles northwest of Richmond, 90 miles south of Washington and 3.7 miles underground. In the nearby town of Mineral, Va., Michael Leman knew his Main Street Plumbing & Electrical Supply business would need – at best – serious and expensive repairs.
At worst, it could be condemned. The facade had become detached from the rest of the building, and daylight was visible through a 4- to 6-inch gap that opened between the front wall and ceiling.
“We’re definitely going to open back up,” Leman said. “I’ve got people’s jobs to look out for.”
Leman said he is insured, but some property owners might not be so lucky.
The Insurance Information Institute said earthquakes are not covered under standard U.S. homeowners or business insurance policies, although supplemental coverage is usually available.
The institute says coverage for other damage that may result from earthquakes, such as fire and water damage from burst gas or water pipes, is provided by standard homeowners and business insurance policies in most states. Cars and other vehicles with comprehensive insurance would also be protected.
The U.S. Geological Survey classified the quake as Alert Level Orange, the second-most serious category on its four-level scale. Earthquakes in that range lead to estimated losses between $100 million and $1 billion.
In Culpeper, Va., about 35 miles from the epicenter, walls had buckled at the old sanctuary at St. Stephen’s Episcopal Church, which was constructed in 1821 and drew worshippers including Confederate Gens. Robert E. Lee and J.E.B. Stuart. Heavy stone ornaments atop a pillar at the gate were shaken to the ground. A chimney from the old Culpeper Baptist Church built in 1894 also tumbled down.
At the Washington National Cathedral, spokesman Richard Weinberg said the building’s overall structure remains sound and damage was limited to “decorative elements.”
Massive stones atop three of the four spires on the building’s central tower broke off, crashing onto the roof. At least one of the spires is teetering badly, and cracks have appeared in some flying buttresses.
Repairs were expected to cost millions of dollars – an expense not covered by insurance.
“Every single portion of the exterior is carved by hand, so everything broken off is a piece of art,” Weinberg said. “It’s not just the labor, but the artistry of replicating what was once there.”
The building will remain closed as a precaution. Services to dedicate the memorial honoring Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. were moved.
Other major cities along the East Coast that felt the shaking tried to gauge the risk from another quake.
A few hours after briefly evacuating New York City Hall, Mayor Michael Bloomberg said the city’s newer buildings could withstand a more serious earthquake. But, he added, questions remain about the older buildings that are common in a metropolis founded hundreds of years ago.
“We think that the design standards of today are sufficient against any eventuality,” he said. But “there are questions always about some very old buildings. … Fortunately those tend to be low buildings, so there’s not great danger.”
An earthquake similar to the one in Virginia could do billions of dollars of damage if it were centered in New York, said Barbara Nadel, an architect who specializes in securing buildings against natural disasters and terrorism.
The city’s 49-page seismic code requires builders to prepare for significant shifting of the earth. High-rises must be built with certain kinds of bracing, and they must be able to safely sway at least somewhat to accommodate for wind and even shaking from the ground, Nadel said.
Buildings constructed in Boston in recent decades had to follow stringent codes comparable to anything in California, said Vernon Woodworth, an architect and faculty member at the Boston Architectural College. New construction on older structures also must meet tough standards to withstand severe tremors, he said.
It’s a different story with the city’s older buildings. The 18th- and 19th-century structures in Boston’s Back Bay, for instance, were often built on fill, which can liquefy in a strong quake, Woodworth said. Still, there just aren’t many strong quakes in New England.
The last time the Boston area saw a quake as powerful as the one that hit Virginia on Tuesday was in 1755, off Cape Ann, to the north. A repeat of that quake would likely cause deaths, Woodworth said. Still, the quakes are so infrequent that it’s difficult to weigh the risks versus the costs of enacting tougher building standards regionally, he said.
People in several of the affected states won’t have much time to reflect before confronting another potential emergency. Hurricane Irene is approaching the East Coast and could skirt the Mid-Atlantic region by the weekend and make landfall in New England after that.
In North Carolina, officials were inspecting an aging bridge that is a vital evacuation route for people escaping the coastal barrier islands as the storm approaches.
Speaking at an earthquake briefing Wednesday, Washington Mayor Vincent Gray inadvertently mixed up his disasters.
“Everyone knows, obviously, that we had a hurricane,” he said before realizing his mistake.
“Hurricane,” he repeated sheepishly as reporters and staffers burst into laughter. “I’m getting ahead of myself!”
___
Associated Press writers Sam Hananel in Washington; Alex Dominguez in Baltimore; Bob Lewis in Mineral, Va.; Samantha Gross in New York City; and Jay Lindsay in Boston contributed to this report.

Iran and Iraqi Horns Threaten the US: Daniel

Iran-backed Iraqi militia threatens to strike US interests should Israel attack Lebanon

The leader of one of Iraq’s most influential and powerful Iran-backed militias threatened US interests in the Middle East in response to a potential large-scale Israeli military campaign against Hezbollah in southern Lebanon. The Islamic Republic’s proxies in Lebanon, Iraq, and Yemen have increasingly targeted Israeli territory following Hamas’s October 7 attack.

Qais al-Khazali, the secretary general of Asaib Ahl al-Haq (“the League of the Righteous”), warned in a televised speech that should Israel attack Lebanon, “let America know that it has made all its interests in the region and Iraq subject to targeting and danger,” the Lebanese Hezbollah controlled al-Minar reported on June 25. Asaib Ahl al-Haq is listed by the US as a Foreign Terrorist Organization, and Khazali is a Specially Designated Global Terrorist.

Israel has recently ramped up its rhetoric against Hezbollah, possibly indicating an imminent operation in southern Lebanon. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated on June 23 that the intense phase of the war with Hamas in Gaza is gradually concluding and that the Israel Defense Force’s focus will soon shift to Lebanon to fight the Iran-backed Hezbollah.

Khazali’s remarks come a few days after US officials expressed support for Israel in the case of escalating conflict with Hezbollah. President Joe Biden’s envoy Amos Hochstein told Lebanese officials during his Beirut visit that the US will not prevent Israel from invading southern Lebanon should Hezbollah’s attacks persistAxios reported on June 24. A few days prior, US officials reassured an Israeli delegation that the Biden administration is “fully prepared” to back Israel should a “full-out war break out.”

Iran-backed militias in Iraq had temporarily halted their attacks against US bases in the region following the Islamic Resistance’s strike that killed three US service members in Jordan on January 28. However, six months later, it appears that Iran and its proxies’ calculations have shifted. A drone was intercepted at the Al-Tanf military base in Syria on June 22, likely launched by Iran-backed militias in Iraq. This attack came shortly after the Iran-backed Kata’ib Sayyid al-Shuhada blamed the US for a June 21 strike near the Syrian-Iraqi border.

Khazali: An Iranian proxy

Khazali has a long history of supporting and directing Iranian-backed Shia militias in Iraq and Syria. Before Khazali and his brother, Laith, along with a senior Hezbollah military commander known as Musa Ali Daqduq, were captured by British forces in March 2007 and transferred into US custody, they played a significant role in forming what US military commanders called “the Mahdi Army Special Groups.”

Daqduq, who had served as the commander of Hezbollah’s special forces, was tasked by the Qods Force to organize, train, and advise the Mahdi Army Special Groups. These Special Groups were established as an analog to Lebanese Hezbollah, Iran’s premier proxy in the Middle East. Daqduq worked closely with the Khazali brothers.

These groups received training, funds, weapons, intelligence, and other key aid from Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Qods Force (IRGC-QF). During his detention, Khazali admitted to playing a pivotal role in the Special Group’s formation and subsequent attacks on US, Coalition, and Iraqi forces. [See LWJ report: Iraqi militant Qais Khazali warned us about Iran. We ignored him.]

The League of the Righteous is responsible for thousands of attacks on US forces in Iraq. However, its assault on the Karbala Provincial Joint Communications Center in 2006 was particularly brazen and significant. The group plotted the operation with the help of Qods Force, and the League of the Righteous fighters who carried out the attack trained in an Iranian mock-up facility. The plan was to capture American soldiers and bring them to Iran. Khazali issued the order to kidnap US service members, but League of the Righteous fighters instead executed five American soldiers in cold blood when the operation hit a roadblock.

Despite their involvement in the deadly Shia insurgency in Iraq and complicity in killing hundreds of American troops, the US military freed Qais and Laith al-Khazali in 2009. More than 100 League of the Righteous commanders and fighters were also freed. Daqduq was handed over to the Iraqi government in 2011 and freed shortly afterward. The US State Department listed Daqduq as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist in late 2012.

The US military released the Khazalis and their men because it believed the League of the Righteous would lay down their arms and join the political process. They did no such thing. Upon his return, Qais retook control of the League of the Righteous, and he serves as its secretary general to this day. The group remains one of the premier Iranian-backed militias in Iraq and has expanded its activities into Syria under the banner of Harakat al Nujaba.

Designation of Khazali and the League of the Righteous

The US Treasury Department designated Khazali, his brother Laith, and other militia leaders for human rights abuses over killing dozens of innocent Iraqi civilians amid nationwide anti-Iran uprisings in 2019.

In March 2020, the US State Department added the Asaib Ahl al Haq to its list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations. Additionally, the Khazali brothers were added to the list of Specially Designated Global Terrorists. [See LWJ report: State designates Iran-backed League of the Righteous as Foreign Terrorist Organization.]

Asaib Ahl al Haq “and its leaders are violent proxies of the Islamic Republic of Iran,” former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said in the press release announcing the designations. “Acting on behalf of their masters in Tehran, they use violence and terror to further the Iranian regime’s efforts to undermine Iraqi sovereignty.”

State’s designation acknowledged that the League of the Righteous “is extensively funded and trained by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Qods Force.”

According to State, the League of the Righteous “has claimed responsibility for more than 6,000 attacks against U.S. and Coalition forces since its creation in 2006. AAH has carried out highly sophisticated operations, including mortar attacks on an American base, the downing of a British helicopter, and an attack on the Karbala Provincial Headquarters that resulted in the capture and murder of five American soldiers.”

Bill Roggio is a Senior Fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and the Editor of FDD’s Long War Journal. Janatan Sayeh is a research analyst at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies focused on Iranian domestic affairs and the Islamic Republic’s regional malign influence.

China Horn adds 90 nukes: Daniel 7

China adds 90 nukes, puts warheads on ‘high operational alert’

China adds 90 nukes, puts warheads on ‘high operational ale

Ajay Banerjee

New Delhi, June 26

The global nuclear warhead stockpile has increased. China had added some 90 nukes to its arsenal and, for the first time, it has warheads on ‘high operational alert’. India has also effected a small increase, says data released today by the Sweden-based international think-tank Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).

At the start of 2024, nine countries—the United States, Russia, the UK, France, China, India, Pakistan, North Korea and Israel—together possessed approximately 12,121 nuclear weapons.

An estimated 3,904 of these warheads were deployed with operational forces, including 2,100 warheads being kept in a state of high operational alert—that is about 100 more than the previous year.

Nearly all of the warheads on “high operational alert” belonged to Russia or the United States, but for the first time, China is believed to have some warheads on high operational alert, SIPRI said.

As of January 2024, China maintained an estimated total stockpile of about 500 nuclear warheads. This is around 90 more than SIPRI’s estimate for the previous year, the data says.

In an unrelated development, the Indian Chief of Defence Staff General Anil Chauhan today said the threat from nuclear weapons has once again occupied centrestage in the geopolitical landscape. Gen Chauhan was delivering the keynote address on ‘Nuclear Strategy: Contemporary Developments and Future Possibilities’ in a seminar organised by Centre for Air Power Studies today, the Ministry of Defence said

The Nations Prepare to Trample the Outer Court: Revelation 11

 IDF SOLDIERS stand on top of a tank near the Israel-Gaza border, this week. Among the many disingenuous and ahistorical narratives, says the writer, is that Israel has done enough harm to Hamas, and should allow it to perhaps even remain in power in Gaza.  (photo credit: AMIR COHEN/REUTERS)
IDF SOLDIERS stand on top of a tank near the Israel-Gaza border, this week. Among the many disingenuous and ahistorical narratives, says the writer, is that Israel has done enough harm to Hamas, and should allow it to perhaps even remain in power in Gaza. (photo credit: AMIR COHEN/REUTERS)

‘Middle East preparing for war’: Arab states anticipate coming escalation, fmr. IDF officer says

Col. (res.) Alon Eviatar: ‘The main headlines in the Middle East this morning are about preparations for war.’

Col. (res.) Alon Eviatar was interviewed this past Sunday on 103FM to address the IDF’s ongoing battle against Hamas in Gaza and the potential for an all out war with Hezbollah in Lebanon.

“I think Hamas is marking several important events in the coming days or weeks. The most important thing, above all tactical events and eliminations, is that I think Hamas is aiming to reach a state of real war between Israel and Hezbollah,” Eviatar stated.

“The Middle East is preparing for war. From Hamas’s perspective, this is what will get it out of its situation in Gaza. From Hamas’s point of view, a war with Hezbollah will end the IDF’s military action in Gaza on Hamas’s terms. For Hamas, a war with Hezbollah would flank Israel from the North as well,” he added.

 Hamas Leadership Conference in Gaza (credit: Atiya Muhammad,/Flash 90)
Hamas Leadership Conference in Gaza (credit: Atiya Muhammad,/Flash 90)

The Middle East prepares for war

“The main headlines in the Middle East this morning are about preparations for war. I see this even from Jordan. This is the main discourse in the Arab media and in Arab news studios – everyone is talking about it. The context is not the joining of Arab states into the war circle, but preparation for the situation where this might happen.”

 Sinwar, Nasrallah, Netanyahu (credit:  Arab networks, Atiya Mohammed Flash 90, Dana Kopel, Pool (Flash 90)
Sinwar, Nasrallah, Netanyahu (credit: Arab networks, Atiya Mohammed Flash 90, Dana Kopel, Pool (Flash 90)

Eviatar explained, “If I try to get inside the psyche of Hamas, I see an accusing finger from the public’s point of view in the current situation in Gaza. Despite the tactical military victories and daily achievements, there are certainly other places where Israel is, of course, hitting the familiar Hamas framework. Yet, Hamas is not suffering from a decline in public popularity.”

“In other words,” Eviatar said, “the more impoverished and disconnected the public in Gaza becomes, the more dependent it will be on Hamas, unequivocally.”

Another Shaker Before the Sixth Seal: Revelation 6

Mag. 2.1 quake - 1 km SSE of Crown Heights, New York, on Wednesday, Jun 26, 2024, at 03:02 am (New York time)

Weak magnitude 2.1 earthquake at 8 km depth

26 Jun 13:18 UTCFirst to report: EMSC after 6 hours.
26 Jun 13:18: Now using data updates from USGS

I didn’t feel it

I felt this quake

Earthquake details

Date & timeJun 26, 2024 07:02:58 UTC – 15 hours agoLocal timeWednesday, Jun 26, 2024, at 03:02 am (America/New York GMT -4)StatusConfirmed (manually revised)Magnitude2.1Depth8.3 kmEpicenter41.6267°N / 73.9341°WDutchess, New York, United StatesSeismic antipode41.6267°S / 106.0659°EShakingII Very weak shakingFelt8 reportsPrimary data sourceUSGS (United States Geological Survey)Estimated energy

The Russian Horn is Growing Drastically: Daniel 7

strategic bomber used for  Kh-101 cruise missiles

Russia’s weapons production has actually increased dramatically despite Western sanctions, report says

Russia’s output of artillery rounds, missiles and drones has soared since it invaded Ukraine, says a new report, and the U.S. and allies have “little to show” for their barrage of sanctions.

June 26, 2024, 1:30 AM MDT

Western sanctions have failed to undermine Russia’s weapons production and Moscow has even managed to ramp up the manufacturing of key weapons to fuel its war against Ukraine, according to a new report by a London-based think tank.

The sanctions effort has been hampered by overly cautious decision-making by Western governments and delays in sharing intelligence among Western allies, said the report by the Royal United Services Institute. 

Although the U.S. and its partners have touted an array of sanctions over the past two years to choke off Moscow’s access to key parts needed to build weapons, Russia has dramatically increased the production of artillery rounds, cruise missiles, ballistic missiles and drones since its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, according to the report.

In 2021, before Russian forces invaded, Moscow produced 56 Kh-101 cruise missiles a year. By last year, it had manufactured 460 cruise missiles, according to the report. Russia’s stock of Iskander ballistic missiles also has increased dramatically, from about 50 before the invasion to 180, even though Russia has launched large numbers of the missiles on the battlefield, it said.

To make munitions for missiles and drones, Russia depends on micro-electronics imported from abroad, but U.S. and European measures have failed to block Moscow’s access to those electronic components. Russia has maintained an ample supply of antennas manufactured by an Irish company that are used in glide kits for bombs, according to the report. 

The expansion of Russia’s weapons production offers clear evidence that thousands of Western sanctions have proved ineffective, the report said. “In summary, despite the diligent efforts of many civil servants, backed by the political will to disrupt Russia’s military–industrial output, there is little to show for it,” it said.

Image: russian nuclear drills
Russian soldiers load an Iskander-M short-range ballistic missile launchers at a firing position as part of Russian military drill intended to train the troops in using tactical nuclear weapons in a photo taken from video released June 12.Russian Defense Ministry Press Service via AP

The U.S. Treasury Department this month announced a new set of sanctions over Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, including penalties for foreign banks that deal with Russia’s economy and restrictions to block the export of certain U.S.-made software and IT services to Russia.

The authors of the report argue that it is still possible for the U.S. and its allies to choke off the supply or prohibitively raise the cost of electronic components, machine tooling and raw materials needed for Russia’s weapons production. 

To make sanctions stick, governments need to share relevant intelligence — including classified information — rapidly to allow for timely enforcement of export controls or action. Western governments should form an “intelligence fusion center” that could build “a common recognized target picture of the Russian defense industry,” it said.

Better intelligence sharing would also allow allies to undertake coordinated action — including clandestine measures — to undercut Russia’s weapons production, the report said.

There are “multiple stages throughout the production process where intervention, both overt and covert, can cause delay, the degradation in quality, or a serious increase in cost to Russia’s arms production,” the report said.

China horn’s alarming nuclear arsenal

China’s alarming nuclear arsenal

June 25, 2024 1:22 pm

Concerns over China‘s nuclear intentions rose recently as the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, or SIPRI, published a new reportfinding that the Chinese nuclear arsenal is expanding rapidly. 

The number of operational nuclear warheads globally is increasing every year, the report found, with the most rapidly increasing stockpile belonging to China. The institute estimated that the size of China’s nuclear arsenal increased from 410 warheads in January 2023 to 500 in January 2024 and is expected to keep growing. For the first time, China may also be deploying a small number of warheads on missiles during peacetime. 

Depending on its military buildup decisions, China could match the number of intercontinental ballistic missiles possessed by Russia or the United States by the end of the decade. Nevertheless, its stockpile of nuclear warheads is anticipated to remain markedly smaller than those of both these countries. The institute predicted the Chinese arsenal of active intercontinental nuclear missiles could grow to match the American and Russian armaments by 2030. 

The report also found that China has recently gained the capability to deploy multiple warheads on ballistic missiles, something only Russia, France, the United Kingdom, and the U.S. have. This could lead to a rapid escalation in deployed warheads and the potential for nuclear-armed nations to threaten the destruction of a much larger number of targets.

These facts have startling implications for global security. 

China has surged to become the world’s fourth-largest arms exporter, closely following the U.S., Russia, and France. Its military influence stretches across Africa and the South China Sea, fueled by efforts to achieve self-reliance in the global arms industry. Over the past five years, China has drastically reduced arms imports by nearly half, replacing foreign weaponry with its own technologies. A recent report from SIPRI underscores this trend, revealing a 44% decline in China’s arms imports from 2019 to 2023, dropping it to 10th place among global buyers. This growing autonomy raises alarming concerns amid China’s expanding military threats.

We must stop viewing China as a minor player on the global stage. While the U.S. initiated China’s integration into the global economy during the Nixon administration, today’s China is vastly different. Despite a slower economic growth rate compared to previous years, China is advancing both economically and militarily. It should be treated with caution and respect as such