Quakeland: On the Road to America’s Next Devastating Earthquake: Revelation 6

Quakeland: On the Road to America’s Next Devastating Earthquake

Roger BilhamQuakeland: New York and the Sixth Seal (Revelation 6:12)

Given recent seismic activity — political as well as geological — it’s perhaps unsurprising that two books on earthquakes have arrived this season. One is as elegant as the score of a Beethoven symphony; the other resembles a diary of conversations overheard during a rock concert. Both are interesting, and both relate recent history to a shaky future.

Journalist Kathryn Miles’s Quakeland is a litany of bad things that happen when you provoke Earth to release its invisible but ubiquitous store of seismic-strain energy, either by removing fluids (oil, water, gas) or by adding them in copious quantities (when extracting shale gas in hydraulic fracturing, also known as fracking, or when injecting contaminated water or building reservoirs). To complete the picture, she describes at length the bad things that happen during unprovoked natural earthquakes. As its subtitle hints, the book takes the form of a road trip to visit seismic disasters both past and potential, and seismologists and earthquake engineers who have first-hand knowledge of them. Their colourful personalities, opinions and prejudices tell a story of scientific discovery and engineering remedy.

Miles poses some important societal questions. Aside from human intervention potentially triggering a really damaging earthquake, what is it actually like to live in neighbourhoods jolted daily by magnitude 1–3 earthquakes, or the occasional magnitude 5? Are these bumps in the night acceptable? And how can industries that perturb the highly stressed rocks beneath our feet deny obvious cause and effect? In 2015, the Oklahoma Geological Survey conceded that a quadrupling of the rate of magnitude-3 or more earthquakes in recent years, coinciding with a rise in fracking, was unlikely to represent a natural process. Miles does not take sides, but it’s difficult for the reader not to.

She visits New York City, marvelling at subway tunnels and unreinforced masonry almost certainly scheduled for destruction by the next moderate earthquake in the vicinity. She considers the perils of nuclear-waste storage in Nevada and Texas, and ponders the risks to Idaho miners of rock bursts — spontaneous fracture of the working face when the restraints of many million years of confinement are mined away. She contemplates the ups and downs of the Yellowstone Caldera — North America’s very own mid-continent supervolcano — and its magnificently uncertain future. Miles also touches on geothermal power plants in southern California’s Salton Sea and elsewhere; the vast US network of crumbling bridges, dams and oil-storage farms; and the magnitude 7–9 earthquakes that could hit California and the Cascadia coastline of Oregon and Washington state this century. Amid all this doom, a new elementary school on the coast near Westport, Washington, vulnerable to inbound tsunamis, is offered as a note of optimism. With foresight and much persuasion from its head teacher, it was engineered to become an elevated safe haven.

Miles briefly discusses earthquake prediction and the perils of getting it wrong (embarrassment in New Madrid, Missouri, where a quake was predicted but never materialized; prison in L’Aquila, Italy, where scientists failed to foresee a devastating seismic event) and the successes of early-warning systems, with which electronic alerts can be issued ahead of damaging seismic waves. Yes, it’s a lot to digest, but most of the book obeys the laws of physics, and it is a engaging read. One just can’t help wishing that Miles’s road trips had taken her somewhere that wasn’t a disaster waiting to happen.

Catastrophic damage in Anchorage, Alaska, in 1964, caused by the second-largest earthquake in the global instrumental record.

In The Great Quake, journalist Henry Fountain provides us with a forthright and timely reminder of the startling historical consequences of North America’s largest known earthquake, which more than half a century ago devastated southern Alaska. With its epicentre in Prince William Sound, the 1964 quake reached magnitude 9.2, the second largest in the global instrumental record. It released more energy than either the 2004 Sumatra–Andaman earthquake or the 2011 Tohoku earthquake off Japan; and it generated almost as many pages of scientific commentary and description as aftershocks. Yet it has been forgotten by many.

The quake was scientifically important because it occurred at a time when plate tectonics was in transition from hypothesis to theory. Fountain expertly traces the theory’s historical development, and how the Alaska earthquake was pivotal in nailing down one of the most important predictions. The earthquake caused a fjordland region larger than England to subside, and a similarly huge region of islands offshore to rise by many metres; but its scientific implications were not obvious at the time. Eminent seismologists thought that a vertical fault had slipped, drowning forests and coastlines to its north and raising beaches and islands to its south. But this kind of fault should have reached the surface, and extended deep into Earth’s mantle. There was no geological evidence of a monster surface fault separating these two regions, nor any evidence for excessively deep aftershocks. The landslides and liquefied soils that collapsed houses, and the tsunami that severely damaged ports and infrastructure, offered no clues to the cause.

“Previous earthquakes provide clear guidance about present-day vulnerability.” The hero of The Great Quake is the geologist George Plafker, who painstakingly mapped the height reached by barnacles lifted out of the intertidal zone along shorelines raised by the earthquake, and documented the depths of drowned forests. He deduced that the region of subsidence was the surface manifestation of previously compressed rocks springing apart, driving parts of Alaska up and southwards over the Pacific Plate. His finding confirmed a prediction of plate tectonics, that the leading edge of the Pacific Plate plunged beneath the southern edge of Alaska along a gently dipping thrust fault. That observation, once fully appreciated, was applauded by the geophysics community.

Fountain tells this story through the testimony of survivors, engineers and scientists, interweaving it with the fascinating history of Alaska, from early discovery by Europeans to purchase from Russia by the United States in 1867, and its recent development. Were the quake to occur now, it is not difficult to envisage that with increased infrastructure and larger populations, the death toll and price tag would be two orders of magnitude larger than the 139 fatalities and US$300-million economic cost recorded in 1964.

What is clear from these two books is that seismicity on the North American continent is guaranteed to deliver surprises, along with unprecedented economic and human losses. Previous earthquakes provide clear guidance about the present-day vulnerability of US infrastructure and populations. Engineers and seismologists know how to mitigate the effects of future earthquakes (and, in mid-continent, would advise against the reckless injection of waste fluids known to trigger earthquakes). It is merely a matter of persuading city planners and politicians that if they are tempted to ignore the certainty of the continent’s seismic past, they should err on the side of caution when considering its seismic future.

The World Horns are Nuking Up: Daniel

A Russian RS-24 Yars nuclear missile complex at a rehearsal for a military parade in Red Square, Moscow, on May 5, 2024.

World’s nuclear powers strengthening arsenals as geopolitical tensions grow, report finds

London CNN

Nuclear-armed countries are strengthening their arsenals and several have made ready new nuclear-armed or nuclear-capable weapons systems amid rising geopolitical tensions, a new report has found.

The nine nuclear states – the United States, Russia, the United Kingdom, France, China, India, Pakistan, North Korea and Israel – have continued to modernize their weapons stockpiles, with China, for the first time, possibly deploying “a small number of warheads on missiles during peacetime,” the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) said in a new report published Monday.

“While the global total of nuclear warheads continues to fall as Cold War-era weapons are gradually dismantled, regrettably we continue to see year-on-year increases in the number of operational nuclear warheads,” the institute’s director Dan Smith said. “This trend seems likely to continue and probably accelerate in the coming years and is extremely concerning.”

In January 2024, the total global stockpile of warheads was estimated at 12,121, of which about 9,585 were in military stockpiles for potential use, according to SIPRI. The think tank estimates that 3,904 of those warheads were deployed with missiles and aircraft, or 60 more warheads than in January 2023.

A television news programme in Seoul, South Korea, shows footage of a North Korean missile test on January 1, 2020.

The majority of the deployed warheads, about 2,100, were kept “in a state of high operational alert on ballistic missiles,” SIPRI said. While nearly all of those warheads belonged to the US and Russia, for the first time China is also believed to have some warheads on high operational alert.

Russia and the US together own nearly 90 percent of all nuclear weapons and the number of useable warheads they possessed in 2023 remained stable for the most part, according to the Swedish think tank. However, Russia is estimated to have deployed about 36 more warheads with operational forces than in January 2023.

“Transparency regarding nuclear forces has declined in both countries in the wake of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, and debates around nuclear-sharing arrangements have increased in saliency,” the Swedish think tank said.

Related article Russia vetoes US-backed UN resolution to ban nuclear weapons in space

Russia and the US also possess more than 1,200 warheads each that have been previously retired from military service, and are gradually being dismantled, it said.

The institute said despite “public claims made in 2023” that Russia had deployed nuclear weapons on Belarusian territory, “there is no conclusive visual evidence that the actual deployment of warheads has taken place.”

The size of China’s nuclear arsenal is estimated to have increased from 410 warheads in January 2023 to 500 in January 2024, “and it is expected to keep growing,” according to SIPRI.

“China is expanding its nuclear arsenal faster than any other country,” said Hans M. Kristensen, associate senior fellow with SIPRI’s Weapons of Mass Destruction Program. “But in nearly all of the nuclear-armed states there are either plans or a significant push to increase nuclear forces.”

China could potentially have as many intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) as Russia or the US by the end of the decade, but Beijing’s stockpile of nuclear warheads is expected to remain much smaller compared to their stockpiles.

North Korea’s military nuclear program continues to be “a central element of its national security strategy,” and SIPRI estimates the hermit kingdom possesses about 50 warheads and enough fissile material to reach up to 90 warheads, numbers that represent “significant increases over the estimates for January 2023.”

In 2023, North Korea appeared to have carried out its first test of a short-range ballistic missile from a rudimentary silo and completed the development of at least two types of land-attack cruise missile (LACM) designed to deliver nuclear weapons, according to SIPRI.

“Like several other nuclear-armed states, North Korea is putting new emphasis on developing its arsenal of tactical nuclear weapons,” said Matt Korda, Associate Researcher with SIPRI’s Weapons of Mass Destruction Program. “Accordingly, there is a growing concern that North Korea might intend to use these weapons very early in a conflict.”

Protesters against nuclear weapons outside the US mission to the UN.

Wars weaken diplomacy

The Swedish think tank said the wars in Ukraine and Gaza have further weakened nuclear diplomacy on the global stage.

In 2023 Russia suspended participation in the Treaty on Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms (New START), the last remaining nuclear arms control treaty limiting Russian and US strategic nuclear forces, while in response the US also stopped sharing data.

Moscow has continued to make threats involving the use of nuclear weapons in light of Western aid for Ukraine, and in May 2024 carried out tactical nuclear weapons drills close to the Ukrainian border, SIPRI said.

“We have not seen nuclear weapons playing such a prominent role in international relations since the Cold War,” said Wilfred Wan, the director of SIPRI’s Weapons of Mass Destruction Program. “It is hard to believe that barely two years have passed since the leaders of the five largest nuclear-armed states jointly reaffirmed that ‘a nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought’,” he said.

Furthermore, an agreement between Iran and the US in June 2023 “seemed to temporarily de-escalate tensions between the two countries,” but the start of the Israel–Hamas war in October “upended the agreement, with proxy attacks by Iran-backed groups on US forces in Iraq and Syria apparently ending Iranian–US diplomatic efforts,” SIPRI said.

The Israel–Hamas war also “undermined efforts” to engage Israel in the Conference on the Establishment of a Middle East Zone Free of Nuclear Weapons and Other Weapons of Mass Destruction, the think tank said.

Israel Knew of October 7th Attack: Revelation 11

Israeli intel warned of Hamas plans before October 7 attack: report

Israeli intel warned of Hamas plans before October 7 attack: report

JERUSALEM

An Israeli intelligence brief prepared weeks before Hamas‘s Oct. 7 attack had warned military officials of the Palestinian group’s preparations for an assault, according to Israeli public broadcaster Kan.Play Video

Haberin Devamı

The Israeli military’s signals intelligence unit drafted the brief in September, less than a month before the Hamas attack that sparked the ongoing war in the Gaza Strip, Kan reported on Monday.

It said the Unit 8200 intelligence document included details of elite Hamas fighters training for hostage-taking and plans for raids on military positions and Israeli communities in southern Israel.

The brief said the Palestinian militants were aiming to take hundreds of hostages, Kan reported.

“The expected number of hostages: 200-250 people”, the brief said according to Kan.

Israel launched its war on Gaza in retaliation for the Hamas’ Oct. 7 attacks that resulted in the deaths of more than 1,190 people, mostly civilians, according to Israeli official figures.

Hamas seized 251 hostages. Of these 116 remain in Gaza, although the army says 41 of them are dead.

Israel’s offensive has killed more than 37,000 people in Gaza, mostly civilians, according to the Hamas-run territory’s health ministry.

According to Kan, citing unnamed security officials, the brief was known to intelligence officials in the military’s Gaza Division and Southern Command.

Israeli politicians have rebuffed calls for a thorough investigation into intelligence failures surrounding the Hamas attack, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has insisted any official probe should wait until after the war, now in its ninth month.

The Israeli military however told AFP it was “investigating the events” of October 7, with a probe being “actively carried out” and would later be made public.

European Horns Threaten the Russian Nuclear Horn: Daniel 7

NATO escalates nuclear tensions with Russia

NATO’s Secretary General, Jens Stoltenberg, has issued one of the most overt nuclear responses so far to Russia’s use of nuclear threats since its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. In an interview with a British newspaper, The Telegraph, Mr Stoltenberg, said NATO is discussing putting more nuclear weapons on standby “I won’t go into operational details about how many nuclear warheads should be operational and which should be stored, but we need to consult on these issues. That’s exactly what we’re doing.”

Basing his arguments in the flawed deterrence doctrine NATO follows along with all nuclear-armed states and their nuclear supporting allies, Mr Stoltenberg, who stands down in a few weeks’ time, went on to urge the Alliance to use nuclear signalling more openly against other states: “Transparency helps to communicate the direct message that we, of course, are a nuclear alliance ….  Nato’s aim is, of course, a world without nuclear weapons, but as long as nuclear weapons exist, we will remain a nuclear alliance, because a world where Russia, China and North Korea have nuclear weapons, and Nato does not, is a more dangerous world.”

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s spokesperson, Dmitry Peskov, was quick to respond: “This is nothing but another escalation of tension“.

Mr Peskov also pointed out how the NATO chief’s comments appeared to contradict the declaration at the end of the Ukraine Peace Conference in Switzerland the day before that said any threat or use of nuclear weapons in the context of Ukraine was inadmissible.

Alicia Sanders-Zakre, ICAN’s Policy and Research coordinator called on all sides to stop ratcheting up tensions: “A day after joining in criticism of Russia for its inadmissible nuclear threats, the NATO Secretary General is flaunting a nuclear response. This is the kind of dangerous escalation,  inherent to the doctrine of deterrence, that ICAN has been warning about for some time, both sides need to step back and reduce tensions.”

Ms Sanders-Zakre continued: “The NATO countries hosting US nuclear weapons should admit to their citizens that they have these inhumane weapons on their soil without their say. That’s the kind of transparency NATO should be practising. Neither these NATO members – Belgium, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands and Türkiye – or Belarus, which has been carrying out nuclear exercises with Russia, should be demonstrating their willingness to join in the killing of millions of people.”

The advocates of deterrence doctrine claim it ensures stability and keeps the peace, but it does the exact opposite. It encourages proliferation where more countries possess nuclear weapons, as the most recent case of North Korea clearly shows, as well as reckless armed engagements. History also demonstrates that it encourages the kind of brinkmanship we saw in the Cuban Missile Crisis that took us to the brink of a nuclear catastrophe that was only averted by luck.

Nuclear experts have criticised Mr Stoltenberg’s poorly thought through escalatory rhetoric.  In the current Ukraine crisis it increases dangers, especially to the European populations officials like the NATO Secretary-General are committed to protect.  

As the states parties to the UN Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons have said, deterrence doctrine is a threat to all countries’ security and is an obstacle to disarmament. The use of nuclear weapons, and even the threat of use, is not something to be done or considered lightly as it threatens civilian populations across the globe. Mr Stoltenberg’s latest comments about NATO being a nuclear alliance clearly reveal that he, and others who support outdated deterrence doctrine, need to remember that behind these words are weapons designed to cause massive civilian harm.

India Prepares for the First Nuclear War: Revelation 8

india set to acquire nuclear capable brahmos supersonic cruise missiles photo anadolu agency

India surpasses Pakistan in Nuclear arsenal: SIPRI report

Pakistan maintained its nuclear arsenal in 2023 while India surpassed Islamabad, focusing on China.

India set to acquire nuclear-capable BrahMos supersonic cruise missiles. PHOTO: ANADOLU AGENCY

India now possesses more nuclear weapons than Pakistan, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute’s (SIPRI) annual review for 2024.

The report on global armaments, disarmament, and security revealed that the United States leads in nuclear capabilities, followed by Russia, the UK, France, China, India, Pakistan, North Korea, and Israel.

SIPRI’s analysis indicated that India had increased its nuclear arsenal, surpassing Pakistan in the number of warheads. Both countries are involved in ongoing efforts to modernise their nuclear forces.

While India traditionally aimed its nuclear strategy at Pakistan, there’s a noticeable shift towards bolstering longer-range capabilities, potentially extending to targets within China.

India is actively working on developing new systems, including ballistic and cruise missiles, to enhance its nuclear capabilities. Pakistan, while slightly behind India in terms of sheer numbers, is also focused on modernising its arsenal with new delivery systems.

Read also: Nuclear arms spending soars as global tensions swell: studies

Dan Smith, SIPRI Director, stated, “While the global number of nuclear warheads continues to fall as Cold War-era weapons are gradually dismantled, regrettably we continue to see year-on-year increases in the number of operational nuclear warheads.”

In January 2024, there were approximately 9,585 nuclear warheads in military stockpiles, with 3,904 deployed and around 2,100 on high operational alert. Nearly all these warheads belonged to Russia or the USA, but for the first time, China is believed to have some on high operational alert.

“China is expanding its nuclear arsenal faster than any other country,” said Hans M. Kristensen, SIPRI Associate Senior Fellow. He added, “There is a growing concern that North Korea might intend to use these weapons very early in a conflict.”

While Israel maintained its arsenal of 90 warheads, North Korea expanded its arsenal by 20 warheads reaching a total of 50 warheads in military stockpile.

Smith further noted, “We are now in one of the most dangerous periods in human history, with numerous sources of instability.”

Children Dying in the Outer Court: Revelation 11

Palestinians mourn their relatives killed in the Israeli bombardment of the Gaza Strip

Israel war on Gaza live: Gaza gov’t says 3,500 children at risk of dying

This video may contain light patterns or images that could trigger seizures or cause discomfort for people with visual sensitivities.

By Mersiha GadzoUrooba Jamal and Usaid Siddiqui

Published On 18 Jun 202418 Jun 2024

  • Lack of aid, including food, nutritional supplements and vaccines, has put 3,500 children at risk of dying from malnourishment, Gaza’s Government Media Office warns.
  • Lebanese armed group Hezbollah has released drone footage showing surveillance of the Israeli port city of Haifa, as US envoy Amos Hochstein wraps up a visit to Beirut aimed at easing tensions along the Israel-Lebanon border.
  • 9m ago (18:50 GMT)Prominent Gaza doctor dies in Israeli custody: ReportA prominent Palestinian doctor died while in Israeli police custody just six days after he was detained, Israeli outlet Haaretz reported.Dr. Iyad Rantisi, 53, the head of a women’s hospital part of Kamal Adwan Hospital in northern Gaza’s city of Beit Lahia, was detained by the Israeli army last November, according to the outlet. He died at the Shikma prison, a Shin Bet interrogation facility in southern Israel’s Ashkelon, Haaretz said.Shin Bet said they arrested the doctor because he was suspected of being involved in hiding Israeli captives, according to the paper.According to Dr. Husam Abu Safia, the manager of the Kamal Adwan hospital, Rantisi was detained at an army checkpoint while attempting to make the journey from north to south Gaza, following the Israeli military’s orders for evacuation purposes at the start of the war, Safia told Haaretz.The Israeli Justice Ministry has ordered an investigation into Rantisi’s

China Nuclear Horn overtakes Babylon the Great: Daniel 7

China’s advanced nuclear boom overtakes U.S.

Nuclear power plants, by select country

A stacked bar chart that displays the number of fully operational and under-construction nuclear power plants in select countries as of May 2024. The U.S. leads with 94 operational plants, while China has the most under construction at 27. China and France each have 56 operational plants, followed by Russia at 37, South Korea at 26 and Canada at 19.

This chart helps explain how the U.S. has fallen behind China in advanced nuclear industries, a new Information Technology and Innovation Foundation analysis argues.

Why it matters: China, a geopolitical rival, is using domestic development to position itself for a major role in export markets, per the think tank’s report.

The big picture: The U.S., once a leader, is playing catch-up, the analysis from ITIF’s Stephen Ezell states.

  • China likely stands 10 to 15 years ahead of where the United States is in nuclear power (referring especially to the ability to field fourth-generation nuclear reactors),” it finds.

What’s next: The Biden administration has several nuclear research and deployment programs.

  • But the report offers a suite of recommendations for a more aggressive, “whole of government” approach.