The Russian Nuclear Escalation: Revelation 16

Russian Yars ballistic nuclear missiles on mobile launchers roll through Red Square during the Victory Day military parade rehearsals on May 6, 2018 in Moscow, Russia
Russian Yars ballistic nuclear missiles on mobile launchers roll through Red Square during the Victory Day military parade rehearsals on May 6, 2018 in Moscow, Russia.

Moscow could be pushed toward ‘nuclear escalation’ if the US overreacts to Russia’s disastrous invasion of Ukraine, new report warns

Sep 15, 2022, 8:00 AM

  • The US should not overreact to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, a new Costs of War Project report warns.
  • The report underscores that the war has shown Russia’s military is much weaker than previously thought. 
  • If the US overreacts, it could push Moscow toward “nuclear escalation,” the report states. 

If the US and NATO overreact to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine with drastic increases in defense spending and conventional forces in Europe, it could push Moscow toward “nuclear escalation,” a new report from Brown University’s Costs of War Project that was shared exclusively with Insider warns.

“The horrific conflict resulting from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine continues to develop into a volatile situation for European security with the grave possibility of a wider war,” the report says. “In turn, these escalatory pressures have led to calls for significantly enhanced United States defense spending. Yet, it is important that the US not succumb to threat inflation, or ‘speech that gives an exaggerated sense of danger,’ in regards to public and official perceptions of Russia.”

The Cost of War Project report underscores that Russia is “a weaker conventional military power than many in the US had imagined,” as evidenced by its disastrous performance in the war in Ukraine thus far.

In August, the Department of Defense said that the US estimates that Russia had suffered as many as 80,000 casualties in Ukraine — an astonishing number in just six months of war. Russia is also estimated to have lost thousands of armored vehicles.

Though Ukraine was widely expected to be swiftly defeated by Russia prior to the war’s onset, Ukrainian forces have held off the Russian invaders and ensured that they failed to take Kyiv in the early days of the conflict. More recently, Ukraine launched a blistering counteroffensive that has pushed Russia’s forces into retreat.

Meanwhile, the US and its Western allies have moved to isolate Russia both economically and politically. Taken together, all of these factors have placed Russian President Vladimir Putin in a precarious political position, both at home and abroad. 

Along these lines, the Costs of War Project report argues that “there is no additional cause for intensified fear of a Russian military threat to the US nor for the resultant expansion of the Pentagon budget.”

“If the US and NATO increase their military spending and conventional forces in Europe, the weakness of Russian conventional military forces could prompt Moscow to rely more heavily on its nuclear forces,” the report said, adding that “because the Russian military is relatively weak, an over-reaction to Russian aggression could push the Russian leadership toward nuclear escalation.”

The report states that the “greatest threat of nuclear war could lie in the West’s overreaction to Russia’s aggression.”

The report says that though it might seem contrary to conventional wisdom, the US defense budget doesn’t need to grow. “Rather, cognizant of Russia’s conventional military weakness, the US military budget can instead be trimmed,” it adds. 

Though Ukraine has drastically altered assessments of the threat posed by Russia’s conventional military, Putin still has at his disposal the largest nuclear arsenal in the world — 5,977 nuclear warheads, per the Federation of American Scientists, with thousands readily available for delivery to distant targets via land-, air-, and sea-based platforms. Western officials and Russia watchers have warned that if the Russian president feels backed into a corner, it could increase the risk of him using a nuclear weapon in Ukraine. The consequences of such a move could be catastrophic, with global ramifications.

Earlier this week, Retired Brig. Gen. Kevin Ryan told Insider that as Ukraine recaptures territory he’s now “even more concerned” about nuclear-weapon use.

Lyle Goldstein, a professor of international and public affairs at Brown who authored the Costs of War Project report, emphasized that as the world approaches the 60th anniversary of the Cuban missile crisis “it is imperative to mitigate Cold War-type tensions with Moscow and prioritize reducing nuclear risk.”

“Russian aggression in Ukraine requires an international response,” said Stephanie Savell, co-director of the Costs of War Project. “However, it does not justify increased US military budgets, which could ultimately escalate tensions with Russia and once again lead us down a dangerous path.”

Nope “The US military budget is poised to surge above $800 billion, in part due to the conflict in Ukraine. But higher spending isn’t the solution,” Savell added, stating that the research in the new report “lays the foundation for a more honest conversation in the US about what’s truly going to promote peace for people in the region, and for the world.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s